I discovered the cause – I had sister and brother married. Fixed that. Problem 
solved.

It probably needs Legacy program to suggest to user what the cause might be – 
and, for the check/repair to generate an error for this condition and suggest 
its cause.
Though of course the situation is not unheard of.  If it is true, what should 
Legacy FT do?

In this case for my data – it was untrue.

Ian Thomas
Albert Park, Victoria 3206 Australia

From: LegacyUserGroup [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Ian Thomas
Sent: Sunday, 18 June 2017 11:57 AM
To: Legacy User Group <[email protected]>
Subject: [LegacyUG] Descendant report problem

I have a weird error message when running a Descendant report at 5 generations 
– OK at 4 generations. Legacy v9 flags a marriage and gives me MRIN and the 
couple’s names.
The message is that it has processed the marriage 3 times, and there is danger 
of an endless loop.
I backed up, ran Check/Repair (see my previous posting to this list, about 
same-sex relationsship reporting as a possible problem), and after re-running 
the check/repair I have tried the same Descendant report – with the same result.
The error message allows 2 more loops before stopping – I chose that, and 
printed the page on which that error occurs (very grateful for that 
error-checking coded into Legacy, which allows some clarification).
The printed report shows the wife twice (her RIN 710) at gen 5, so I checked 
her parents children: she is the last born, no ‘duplicate’ (and I would not 
expect the RIN number to be duplicated). Her DOB is too soon after birth of 
previous child (but that’s the data I have, and I have seen that problem before 
with no affect on Descendant report).

All I can think of doing is to unlink her from the marriage and her parents, 
and relink. Any other suggestions to try?

Ian Thomas
Albert Park, Victoria 3206 Australia

-- 

LegacyUserGroup mailing list
[email protected]
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe 
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to