Question on two trees that I have in the same family file as my main tree. Using Version 8 with latest update.
I have a family tree of 17 people that I've now been able to find the connection to my main tree. So clicked on "tree" to locate it, there it is, clicked on the person heading that tree (lowest RIN), and she came up but she is already connected to a person in my main tree. So ? can I delete this extra tree ?????? The idea scares me at this point. I ask that question as I have another separate tree with about 30 people that I haven't been able to document connection to main tree but at some point will want to integrate it into main tree. After above was revealed to me, I went and clicked on him to see if that tree was still separate and yes, that one is still by itself, not connected to main tree. I have assumed that I would find the location/person that they connect to, connect them as someone currently in tree (not a new person), and that the separate tree would then cease to exist. Am I totally wrong ???? I just went through a merge of two main tree files (don't ask me how I screwed up and used the wrong database for over a year) but they are now together and checked for accuracy. Could this have caused me to merge that separate tree into the main one during the merge process ? If so, why does it still show that I have a separate tree under her name ? There are no duplicate entries in the name list, just in case you needed to know that. Feel pretty anal at this point Lucy M. AbbottMill Creek, WashingtonMacKay, Wares, Campbell, Budden, Pastoret
-- LegacyUserGroup mailing list [email protected] To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
