Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with Modified Descendents Report

[Support]

Thank you.  I will pass this on to the programmers. Thank you,   Jim Terry Technical Support Millennia Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.LegacyFamilyTree.com     ----- Original Message ----- From: Parker/McClure Family Tree To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 8:23 AM Subject: [LegacyUG] Problem with Modified Descendents Report I would like to report a problem I have seen with the Modifified Descendents Report.  The problem appears to occur if you enter a person as a MALE and later change that record to show that it is a FEMALE.  In the wording of the report, It shows the information about the person and then, in the following example, refers to that person as HE.              6   F     v.          Nancy Jane Call-[3624] 1 was born on 23 FEB 1862 in , Lauderdale, AL, USA1, died on 25 DEC 1946 in , Lauderdale, AL, USA1, 7 and was buried in , Lauderdale, AL, USA, Mt. Zion Church of Christ Cemetery7.   He never married.              7            F            vi.         Martha Call-[3631] 1 was born in 1865 in , Lauderdale, AL, USA1 and died on an unknown date1.    In the above example, I accidentally added Nancy Jane Call as a MALE and later changed it to FEMALE.  As you can see, above, the gender of the person is correctly reported but, in the wording following her information, prior to that of Martha Call, it states HE never married. I have also seen the reverse of this occur, (i.e. accidently record someone as FEMALE, make the correction to MALE and then reports showing the person's gender as male but referring to him as HER in the wording of subsequent information. Michael D. Parker The Parker and McClure Families of North West Alabama