> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Edward
> J. McCormack, Ph.D.
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 1:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Inviting further defense of Clooz
>
>
> Thanks, Ed Yes, my impressions of Clooz are drawn from this list.
How can you publicly write such calumny based on an infinitesimal sample
size and little or no hands-on experience with the program?
> The concensus, except for your post, is that it is not very "user
> friendly" for
> a lot of people...<<<snip>>>
Yes, I've seen a consensus on this list...of three or four people.
> I thought Clooz and Bygones were written for the same purpose. Not so?
Please...read the information posted on each website. You will find them to
be quite different in both process and purpose.
> What would be the difference in your mind between "a sourcing program" and
> "a program designed to enter and keep genealogical research notes."
I don't think this is relevant. I don't think either are called sourcing
programs.
> What does Clooz do with research notes that Bygones doesn't do, and vice
> versa?
If you are interested in what Clooz does, download the manual. If you want
to know what Bygones does, download that information.
Ed Burnet
To unsubscribe: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
