Byron,

I think either single "parentage" event or a "parentage maternal" and "parentage
paternal" would work equally well.  When I chose the single "parentage" event my
logic was that in the majority of individuals I would have parentage proof
(birth certificate, baptismal record, newspaper article, etc.) and where I would
have identified and proved only a mother or father would be a minority.  The
logic is great! What I have found is that I spend more time on one ancestor
where I have only a single parentage proof than probably a 100 ancestors where I
have proof of both the mother and father.  If I was doing it over again and I
may set up two parentage events I would definetly use a "parentage paternal" and
"parentage maternal".

Glenn Kinkade

Byron Blankenship wrote:

> Glenn and Candace,
>
> Thanks.. Your responses are very helpful... at least i know now i am not
> just missing something right in front of me.
>
> I believe I am going to go with your suggestions?  What do you think of two
> Events: Paternal Parentage and Maternal Parentage.... would mean attaching
> sources like birth certificates twice, but such is often the case and it
> would profile separate sets of proofs for each line..
>
> What do you think?
>
> Glenn Wrote:
>
> > You have a very good question.  I am sure that a lot of people have a lot
> of
> > different methods, but let me toss mine in for what it is worth.
> >
> > I add an Event and give it a name "Parentage".  I add the source and
> repository
> > for the information and in the notes field I explain the proof for this
> > hypothesis.  If the proof is only for the father (the child is named in
> the
> > father's will as an heir but the father was married three times, had
> eleven
> > children, and you have not found proof of which wife was the mother of
> this
> > particular child) I explain this in the notes.  If the proof is for both
> the
> > father and mother (the information is from a birth certificate or church
> > baptismal record that names both the father and the mother) then I explain
> this
> > in the notes.  I check the event PRIVATE so it will not print on reports
> but
> > will display when I look at the family.  If I am going on a research trip
> and
> > want this information to print I simply go back and unchecked the PRIVATE
> box.
> >
> > I have found this works pretty well and you can easily see if you have or
> have
> > not proved parentage for an individual.
> >
> > Glenn Kinkade
> >
> >
> > > How does one assign sources to the parent-child relationship or
> child-parent
> > > relationship.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > To unsubscribe: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
> To unsubscribe: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to