On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:50:21 -0500, "David Naylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 19 Dec 2001, Michel Th�bault wrote: > >> a tag like "Living" for private datas, except that we could mark >> "Private" people who died hundred years ago. So, why not a >> "privacy" tag that would work exactly as the "living" tag ? Why not >> using the living tag itself ? Because you cannot turn it on when a >> person has got a death date... > >This already exists in Legacy -- you have 3 assignable tags and a >place to indicate what each is being used for. You can then generate >web pages, etc. without including those tagged individuals. Dave: I just checked and using a tag (and excluding tagged individuals) on web pages does not entirely work. For example, I tagged a child I was not sure of. Legacy did not generate a web-page for that child, but it did reference that child from the parent's web-pages. However, using a tag to exclude individuals on an export would probably work just fine. I guess if I want to create web-pages and use tags to exclude certain individuals I will have to export to a temporary Legacy database first and create my web-pages from there. Legacy Developers: How about a "Private" flag for individuals? -- Dennis M. Kowallek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
