Why not start the wish list for V5? I assume it's better for them to know what to work on sooner rather than later, I assume they keep a log of suggestions (so they won't get lost), and if you don't suggest it when you think it, you'll probably forget.
And what you've said below about the Assigned Sources window I agree with - would be most helpful :-)
Lisa Young
>>>
I continue to wrestle with how to adapt to the way information in the sourcetitle field is now handled. (If you check published, all is put in italics;if you check unpublished, all is put in quotes.) Right now, I have thisfeature disabled by unchecking it under Report Options>Sources. The problemthat remains is that the Output tab on the Assigned Sources window stillshows the title field in either italics or quotes. I use the Output tab alot when I'm trying different approaches to citing unconventional sources.It would be helpful to have it read correctly.By the way, in addition to the published and unpublished boxes, why not haveanother box on the Master Source Definition that says "output as entered."Then, the user could add quotes where desired. Also, with embedded textformatting, the user could add italics where desired. (I hope I haven'tstarted the wish list for 5.0. ;-))
