Why in the world would that be intentional??? We want identical names to list in chronological order, but if AKAs are included, we don't? You need both features to find and compare duplicates.
Lisa
>>>There is no bug here. The Name List without the AKA comes from an Accesstable which also contains Birth, Christ., Dead, Buried dates and places,among other things, so it is possible to sort it by Birth Date.The Name List with AKA comes from a different Access table which doesn'tcontain the Birth Date that's why when you use the option to "IncludeAlternate Names" the Name List is not sorted by Birth Date but rather byRIN.The way it is working now is intentional, no bug
