I'm falling asleep ...

At 2002/09/22 05:00 PM, you wrote:
>Is this a replay??
>
>Henry
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Dora Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 3:09 PM
>Subject: Re: [LegacyUserGroup] How are PAF data bases set up?
>
>
>| Ken:
>|
>| I talked to someone at Legacy who I'm pretty sure was
>| not you, since I mentioned your e-mail about checking
>| your voice mail.
>|
>| It was he who said that the reason why you haven't
>| developed the ability to import PAF files is they are
>| written in Unicode and Legacy stores its data in I
>| think he said ANSI.  He was trying to explain to me
>| that it isn't as easy to develop this particular
>| update as I had thought.
>|
>| But I strongly get the idea it's actually in ANSEL -
>| which is a kind of ASCII which is a subset of ANSI.
>| I don't know if I heard wrong, which I easily could
>| have, or he didn't want to get too specific.
>|
>| Does your program actually use ANSI or ANSEL, and does
>| it often make a substantive difference?  Whoever on
>| your staff said he thinks I have no ancestors who used
>| other alphabets, diacritical marks and all of that was
>| right.
>|
>| None of us thought the problem was insurmountable.  It
>| came across as more difficult than writing the code to
>| import earlier versions of PAF files.  YOu're a good
>| company and doing an upstanding job for three and a
>| half people!   It kind of sounded like you didn't have
>| time or something.  I suspect that people in general
>| don't suppose that a company that is putting out so
>| many copies of such an outstanding product could be a
>| small company, and I didn't.  But knowing that, we
>| were thinking about what it really would take to get
>| around it.
>|
>| I understand your proprietary position.  I'd be
>| surprised if PAF's file structure were top secret
>| since they don't sell it, and they benefit by people
>| being able to import PAF files, but I know probably
>| you have a proprietary relationship with them to have
>| developed some of the things you have.
>|
>| It's too bad PAF doesn't just export to PAF 5 in ANSI
>| or ANSEL.   Maybe in time they will.   Since their
>| mission is to encourage people to do genealogy and not
>| to make money, it is to their advantage for the
>| databases people create in PAF to be portable!  They
>| must have  heard all the fussing about their date
>| formats. Their latest update is supposed to have fixed
>| some of the problem.
>|
>| It would be a good thing to be able to import PAF 5
>| databases for the same reason it was a good thing to
>| import PAF 4 databases; to avoid loss of data due to
>| the inconsistencies between PAF formats and GEDCOM
>| formats.   Now that I both know why it is harder to to
>| write a program update in PAF 5 then for earlier
>| versions of PAF, and know how little time you have for
>| the effort, I fully understand why you have not been
>| in such a rush to make such an update.
>|
>| I don't think it will take me more than a couple of
>| days to find out what happens to my dates when I
>| transfer my data.   I won't have a proper opinion on
>| how badly I need to be able to import a PAF 5 database
>| until then.
>|
>| If I can't transfer my data without losing it, then in
>| time I would have to figure out how to change a PAF
>| file to make it importable to somewhere.
>|
>| Imagine, five days ago I believed that GEDCOM had
>| completely solved this sort of problem!
>|
>| Yours,
>| Dora
>|
>|
>|
>| --- Ken McGinnis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>| wrote:
>| > I missed one.   PAF is in a proprietary format
>| > developed internally by the
>| > LDS Church.  Developers can obtain the file
>| > specification by contacting them
>| > and entering an agreement with them.
>| >
>| > I explained this to Dora when she asked a couple
>| > days ago but thought others
>| > might like to know the answer.  Legacy does not
>| > import a PAF 5.x file
>| > directly for the simple reason that I haven't had
>| > time to work on a direct
>|
>|
>| __________________________________________________
>| Do you Yahoo!?
>| New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
>| http://sbc.yahoo.com
>| Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
>| http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>|
>| To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
>| http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
>|
>| To unsubscribe please visit:
>| http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>|
>
>Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>
>To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
>
>To unsubscribe please visit:
>http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp


C.G. Ouimet
Kingston, Ontario


Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/

To unsubscribe please visit:
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to