Lisa wrote:
> As pointed out, if the relationship is biological, it doesn't work. I
> have to assume that just an oversight that will be fixed :-) After all,
> isn't that the type of relationship we are documenting most often.
Hmm, well it seems to work for me on the Descendant Report,
Modified Register style. 'Course ya gotta put the relationship
type in. For people for whom nothing is entered, nothing is
printed even after checking the box on the report options.
Yup, it'll be a pain in the posterior to go around and put in
all the relationship data. Perhaps yet another option could
be added on report output to say that where the relationship
data is missing or blank, that the report should output "natural".
Then we could just put in the adoptions or whatever at the
few places where that occurs and the software would handle
the rest. Of course if one is interested in documenting the
relationship for future use, that's another story.
jr
Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/
To unsubscribe please visit:
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
