But...but...doesn't a properly constructed citation already indicate whether it is primary or secondary? What am I missing here?
Harvey > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:LegacyUserGroup- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Daniels > Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:04 AM > To: Legacy Group > Subject: [LegacyUG] Citing sources > > I beleive it important to cite all different events. Yet some events > that you come across are primary sources and secondary sources. I would > like to see two different boxes when you writing a new source one > showing the document as being a primary source (This would be shown as > a bold footnote number) and the secondary source would be shown as a( > regular footnote. ) > > So when you are bringing up a report and there are several footnotes by > a name or event you would be able to see wheather the footnote came > from a primary or secondary source. Hopefully all genealogists would > adhere to the correct defination of primary and secondary sources . > > Would any other of you like to see this added to Legacy! > > Bill Daniels > > Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > > To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ > > To unsubscribe please visit: > http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
