If the document is there on the website for you to see, like a picture of the census, I would use both. If the picture is not available you do not know if they have made a mistake on recording the source without viewing it first. If it is just citing the document as a source use the website but put the website's citation of the document as the comments in a citation detail to your source of the Website.
Matt -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis Kowallek Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 9:45 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Double-sources Importance: High On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 15:57:19 +0200, "Jeaneth L. Christensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >When I find some information on a website or the like and the website >gives for instance a document as source of the information, should I >then use the website or the document as the source? I would use both. I would change the imported Master Source to read something like ... "A genealogy of the Quick family in America (as documented by blah-blah-blah)" ... and mark the source as unverified. Then, when you get around to verifying it, you can change the Master Source appropriately. I'm sure other will offer additional suggestions. Use whichever works best for you. -- Dennis M. Kowallek [EMAIL PROTECTED] ****************** Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp
