Robin Paulson wrote: > have i missed something? i thought osm used "Creative Commons > Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license" not "Creative Commons Share Alike > 2.5 Licence" > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/OpenStreetMap_License
I assume the name difference was just loose wording; all recent CC licences have included Attribution. It's no longer optional. The version difference may be a significant error; I haven't looked at diffs. Gerv _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-talk
