Hi, thank you for making the December minutes available. From them I see that you're already having your next meeting today.
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote: > The licence doesn't get implemented if the vote is against its > implementation. If that were to happen then the licence would be back on the > drawing board and wholly open to the full discussion process again. We'd be > no further on but at least it would have been democratically agreed. Ah, so you're planning to hold a vote. That is a relief, it had not come across so clearly until now. Who will be eligible to vote? What process will be used and what outcome will be considered a "yes" outcome? I was under the impression that you'd just put the license up and say "agree to this or don't but we'll use it anyway and will have delete your data if you don't agree. We can talk later but first you have to agree". Which would of course have been hardly acceptable, hence my questions! Mikel's communication was a bit unclear in this respect. He said "We want to move ahead with this draft", and "In the immediate term, the OSM community kick starts this process by first moving to the first draft of the ODL license", without ever saying the word "vote" or contemplating the possibility that the community does not want to move to the license as it is. So the plan is 1. let lawyers do their work 2. publish results 3. allow time for people to digest/discuss/understand but not revise draft 5. hold vote on exact draft as published in 2. 6. if vote positive: implement license and ask mappers to sign up 7. if vote negative: back to the drawing board Is that correct? Mikel? Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk