2009/8/12 Emilie Laffray <emilie.laff...@gmail.com>: > > > 2009/8/12 John Smith <delta_foxt...@yahoo.com> >> >> That was one opinion there was other contradictory opinions given as well. >> We aren't copying from maps but trying to map an observation that will be >> very beneficial to others that come after us. It's just a question of how to >> do this in the most informative matter without risking problems with >> copyright. >> > > The original point remains: this observation is based on easter eggs of > copyrighted data. IANAL but it seems that it is very similar to the > conclusions that were reached that data obtained from Google Maps is not > valid. > I hope that someone with more legal experience will correct me there if I am > wrong.
+1 still I encourage you to map also the remnants of roads, or planned roads as what they are, this is data that has a place in the db and is maybe more usefull than the information of proprietary easter_eggs. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
