On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:25 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/7/13 Kai Krueger <[email protected]>: >> If Richard's statement relayed through Frederik of that at least 90% of data >> is an absolute minimum becomes binding, (which would still leave a huge >> amount of room for wiggeling, after all 10% of data would be still 1 1/2 >> entire Germanys, or nearly all of Europe), much of that fear would likely go >> away. > > > That's a good point: will TIGER, AND and other imports count as > contributions / share of the data? If they do 90% is not much. If we > talk about "honest manual mapping contributions" it is quite > satisfactory on the other hand.
I'm not sure whether such a decision has been made already, but obviously the conversation will be easier to have *after* people have decided on relicensing. Perhaps it illustrates why the LWG don't want to say something arbitrary like "95% of the data" since it does make a difference which different parts of the data are affected. Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
