On 18 July 2010 23:00, TimSC <mapp...@sheerman-chase.org.uk> wrote: > an amicable arrangement. I am not suggesting backmail! After all, the whole > point of PD is that people can do what they want with the data.
I fail to see how you can "force" people to dual license as PD, since you even acknowledge that is the point of PD even if it means the data becomes licensed at ODBL... Also this will fail in various regions of the planet, depending on sources of data and the amount of human resources available, for example the Nearmap Aerial imagery can only be licensed under a share alike license, they are also more likely at the current rate to cover a lot more of Australia than we have human resources on the ground to do it.... _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
