On 19 July 2010 11:13, John Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19 July 2010 20:07, Rob Myers <[email protected]> wrote: > > My source for the fact that creativity is not being relied on is the fact > > that the ODbL doesn't rely on it and the ODbL is the currently proposed > > replacement licence. > > It's my understanding that once someone breaches contract with OSM-F > (or whoever) and say pushes the data via ftp or p2p or ... and the > data is outside Europe where the database directive doesn't apply > isn't the only form of protection still copyright? > > Or contract law. It has been pointed out previously that all map providers are using contract law to restrict their data not copyrights.
Emilie Laffray
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
