Isn't section 4 there so if the licence is changed in the future (section 3) that attribution is needed in a future licence.
Markus_g -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Smith Sent: Friday, 17 September 2010 6:11 AM To: Licensing and other legal discussions. Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata & the new license On 17 September 2010 06:36, Rob Myers <[email protected]> wrote: > If you mean the licence of OSM, that would clash with section 4 of the CTs. In that case, Section 3 clashes with 4, since there is no minimum requirement of attribution. > If you mean a produced work, that would clash with section 4.3 of the ODbL. So then OS data isn't compatible with ODBL? _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
