On 17 September 2010 11:26, Dave F. <[email protected]> wrote: >> With this response b) was seen as compatible. Under a) it was advised >> there is an issue of sub-licensing. Asking source author for >> permission to contribute under CT was an option; as was to keep >> distributing said specific data under license. Item b) is still open >> AFAIK. > > If b) is compatible, could you clarify what you mean by it still being open? >
Yes, it was late, made a mistake. I meant a) CC-BY is still open and not yet resolved. Regards Grant _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
