Grant, On 24 September 2010 20:21, Grant Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > Ordnance Survey's OpenData license specifically allows sub-licensing, > restricted by the need for attribution. There isn't a conflict with > the 'free and open licence' when section 4 (attribution) is taken into > account.
Section 4 only ensures that OSM provide attribution, not that the end user of the OpenData data in OSM has to. For example, hypothetically a 2/3 majority of OSMers could vote for CC0 under the CTs, but this would not be compatible for OpenData as the end-user publishers of the CC0 OSM data would not be obliged to attribute either OSM or OpenData. - David -- David Dean Post-Doctoral Fellow, RP-SAIVT, QUT (me) http://www.davidbdean.com (saivt) http://www.bee.qut.edu.au/projects/saivt/ (post) Room S1101, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Australia 4001 (p) +61 7 3138 9329 (m) 0407 151 912 (CRICOS) 00213J _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
