On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Rob Myers <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/01/2010 04:01 PM, Anthony wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Rob Myers<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> At worst we have conflicting reports. I'll take >>> legal advice over reported email comments in that case, though. >> >> That's fine for the half dozen (?) of you who have access to that >> legal advice. But for the tens of thousands of us who only have >> access to the conflicting legal advice... > > I have no access to the legal advice. I'm simply trusting that the emails I > read on this list are correct (that the LWG have legal advice, and that > other people have email contact with the OS).
So you're actually taking reported email comments over legal advice, and not the other way around. > I am Assuming Good faith. ;-) I don't think the emails I read on this list are lies. But that's a lot different from thinking that they're correct. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
