On 01/10/2010 23:53, Grant Slater wrote:
On 1 October 2010 23:40, andrzej zaborowski<[email protected]> wrote:
The people who
drafted the CT are not very keen on discussing the CT here otherwise,
so this may be the only way to let them know and exercise some
democracy in the project.
I am not the most wordy person in the world.
I've never expected an LWG member to be verbose.
As I said in my OP:
"As I'm a simple lad, can I ask any replies to be a clear, concise &
factual as possible please."
All I've ever wanted was categorical, non caveat answers. After all this
time that the LWG has been discussing this subject, I'm still unable to
receive an objective answer. I find that disappointing.
Some just seem to enjoy arguing, draining goodwill and have stated
they are here to be "politely" disruptive.
The vast majority just want the truth. When are we going to get it?
regards
Dave F.
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
