On 5 January 2011 01:48, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > No, that is not acceptable to me. Someone who participates in OSM must have > the willingness to accept what the majority wants, or else they should not > participate in the first place.
Ummm where is the majority of OSM contributors that want to switch to CT/ODBL and in the process loose lots of map data? So far I've only seen a minor-majority of OSM-F members agreed to some kind of process that might lead to a license change, and a majority of OSM-F board members agree to a license change. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
