On 5 January 2011 04:13, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5 January 2011 04:37, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote: >> That is true. If OSMF wanted to release the data as PD, it would have to >> delete any OS OpenData-derived content first. > > I still don't understand how data could be accepted on that basis in > the first place, either there has to be firm statements that such data > would be removed, not may be removed, or there has to be firm > statements that attribution would be a requirement of future licenses > or that data simply couldn't be incorporated as far as I can see. >
Our mapping is (likely) illegal in North Korea and a few other regions. I bet we would not remove the data even if formally demanded by the North Korean Government etc. The language choice of language is intentional. Regards Grant _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
