On 8 January 2011 20:37, davespod <osmli...@dellams.fastmail.fm> wrote: > If we assume that the reading of ODBL in the LWG minutes is correct, then > ODBL would not require attribution of OSM's sources in produced works (e.g., > maps), rather only attribution of the OSM database. > > https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_87d3bmhxgc > (see 5.c)
Richard has expressed an opinion that produced works must be attributed. > Or am I missing something? (Probably.) The proponents of ODBL can't even agree what it means, so what help is there for the rest of us. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
