It is exactly the issue that I can't give you a copy of the prior terms
(and the argument applies equally well to whatever the agreement could
be construed to be for the mappers that started prior the founding of
the OSMF).
Simon
Am 17.04.2011 14:12, schrieb ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen:
You do realize that you already have an agreement with the OSMF?
Will you sent me a copy ?
OSMF did not even exist when I signed up, so I doubt if there is
another agreement then a single sided.
And I still doubt that OSMF is representing the community
in a way there statutes say.
Gert
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Simon Poole [mailto:si...@poole.ch]
Verzonden: zondag 17 april 2011 12:12
Aan: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the
CT)
Undoubtably a very fuzzy one, where a lot of the terms might be
implicit. You are simply replacing that fuzzy contract with a, not
perfect, but at least with most terms spelt out, new agreement.
Simon
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
