Let's be clear that Cloudmade have not been in any private discussions, nor made any demands of OSMF or the lwg.
We support odbl and I think most (if not all) of us have accepted the new cts. I'd be curious where this came from. Jim Brown -CTO CloudMade (Sent from my iPhone) +44 7595 367 664 On 8 Jun 2011, at 10:49, "Quintin Driver" <quentindrive...@gmail.com> wrote: > Richard, have you or any of the LWG members done any work for MapQuest, > Skobbler and / or Cloudmade ? > > -- > I'm led to believe that people have been issuing LWG with private lists of > demands that they want met before they will consent to ODbL+CT. > > Could I ask that said people have the courtesy to post their demands here, > too? It would be a shame if the suspicion arose that the process is being > swayed by closed demands. LWG does of course publish minutes, as is right and > proper, but there is currently no requirement for those writing to it to > disclose their own demands. > > cheers > Richard > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
