Hi, On 06/29/11 05:21, James Livingston wrote:
I don't think it would be treated differently, because I believe that an in-memory data structure would still be a database (in the ODbL and database right sense of "database"). I don't see how the storage mechanism makes a difference.
Would you therefore say that before I can use proprietary software to process an ODbL data set, I would have to request from the software provider a legal statement about whether or not it does create a database internally?
If I use software that builds an in-memory data structure which you believe to be a database in order to make a produced work, how would you suggest that I fulfil my obligation to make such derived database available on request?
Bye Frederik _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
