As posted on talk-gb, Google Maps appear to have switched to using their own data rather than Tele Atlas's in the UK this morning.

This raises a couple of interesting points.

Firstly, it seems pretty clear to me that some of the data is OS-derived (probably from OpenData or a commercial licence - this isn't an accusation of wrongdoing!). The water bodies have the same shape. Rural woods are given names - information that can be derived from OS and pretty much nowhere else, unless you actually go round and talk to some very old residents. But even then I'm sure that 99% of people in our town wouldn't know the names of most of the woods.

The copyright notice is now "Map data (c) 2011 Google". The OS attribution is two clicks away and fairly well hidden. Why that matters to us: it's a pretty obvious precedent that an NMA is happy with that kind of attribution in a large, aggregated dataset, even for significant use of their data. Or at least I think so.

Secondly, though, I am still bemused as to where some of the data comes from. As an example, if you search for 'High Lodge, East End', you get a cottage at the edge of the Blenheim Palace estate. But it's not High Lodge; that's well within the estate.

I can't see anywhere obvious in the usual data sources, let alone on the ground, to give the impression this is High Lodge. Any thoughts?

(I'm sure there isn't any OSM data in there, but someone may, of course, prove me wrong!)

Finally, there are _lots_ of roads that look like normal roads, but are clearly tagged within Google's database as restricted access. You can route over them, but you get a warning - "This route has restricted usage or private roads" - and each direction is subtitled with "Partial restricted usage road" or somesuch. Will this be enough when someone drives down one and gets shot by the farmer? And are there any exceptions where a rutted track/precipitous drop isn't marked as such?

cheers
Richard


_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Reply via email to