One of three things can happen with the contributions you added on an element which was created initially by somebody else:
- Somebody will 'remap' it instead of you before 1st of April - You will 'remap' it yourself before 1st of April - It will simply be removed wholesale on the 1st of April and somebody will have fun readding it from scratch in (probably) a slightly different way, maybe less complete, but it'll all be all right in the (very) long run. Let's call it growing pains on the way to adulthood of the project. Annoying and time consuming/wasting, but supposedly necessary, or we can call it an exercise in futility or some sort of therapy to keep us all happy and content. What I do: when I edit something, I check whether it may disappear in the future. If so, I replace it and at least my effort won't be wasted. Of course, I check to make sure I'm not dragging bits and pieces of information that were contributed by a naysayer/unreachable along to the new objects I'm creating. Unfortunately this checking requieres a lot of effort in itself though, but the tools are getting better. Jo 2011/12/12 <fk270...@fantasymail.de> > After watching the License Change View on OSM Inspector, I have decided > not to change any of the few red dots and ways marked in the OSM inspector. > Some ways have one old version by an anonymous or undecided author and up > to seven versions by me. That's enough to keep them and if you want to > delete MY edits even though I have agreed to the CT, you may do that, but > remapping them would ignore my editing history. As I have contributed about > 81% of all nodes in my hometown area, it's rather me who has the moral and > legal right to decide what may be kept or not, not the right of a > single-node mapper who draw two ways in 2007. > > There is only one correct location for an intersection and if another > maspper has already occupied this location with his node, there is no > sensible reason to recreate it on the same location. There is no copyright > on single nodes, there is no copyright on moved nodes and there is no > copyright on street names that have already passed the comparison with > municipal government's street list. As I have contributed about 81% of all > nodes in my hometown area, it's rather me who has the predominant copyright > on this map and not the less-than-1% one-node contributors. > > Some of the marked edits are mechanical work requiring neither local > knowledge nor genius: correcting spelling mistakes (e.g. Grade2>grade2), > debugging keepright fixmes, deleting created_by, etc. > > There should be a functionality to mark their nodes and ways as checked, > verified and absolutely insignificant concerning copyright. There is > absolutely no case in history where a one-node mapper, even an anonymous > one-node mapper, was able to claim a copyright based on his less-than-1% > contribution. > > If you want to delete or vandalize the whole map just for pleasing a > non-responding anonymous single-node contributor while destroying the work > of a 150,000-node contributor, you may do that. I am not going to replace > any of the vandalized nodes. As they are often located on important trunk > roads, sometimes even on intersections, their removal might prevent > efficient routing for many years. > > Maybe the license change is just a sociological experiment (like the > Milgram experiment) to check how stupid people are if they are told to > remap existing nodes. > > Cheers! > -- > NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie! > Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
