"Richard Weait" rich...@weait.com wrote on 21/12/2011 at 07:27:19 +1100 subject "[OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested" :
> Of particular interest are: > - can node positions be cleaned by moving to a new position? > - is a mapper declaration of odbl=clean interesting and helpful in > reconciling the data base? +1 for both items > Frederik has recently proposed a new tag, odbl=clean, to be set by > mappers who will vouch for the odbl compliance of any object. The LWG > would like to adopt this as policy and would be grateful for community > feedback." I think odbl=clean is based on the honesty of the OSM contributor. It is exactly the same need of honesty if the contributor does a copy and paste of data in order to make it odbl+ct compliant. The only difference is that history remains intact and that it takes only 0.1% of the time to do it. I support strongly the idea of the odbl=clean tag. -- Sincerely Hendrik Oesterlin - email hendrikmail2...@yahoo.de _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
