Just a reminder, this thread started of with a discussion of attribution, or rather lack of such. I don't think there is very much doubt about what the licence requires even given all the complexity of the ODbL, for a produced work it is:
"However, if you Publicly Use a Produced Work, You must include a notice associated with the Produced Work reasonably calculated to make any Person that uses, views, accesses, interacts with, or is otherwise exposed to the Produced Work aware that Content was obtained from the Database," Our suggested attribution text is already very minimal. It is not clear to me what reasonable objections exist against simply attributing OSM as we require. Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
