On 11/18/2014 10:11 AM, Luis Villa wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Michael Collinson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I would also like to highlight that we also now welcome associate
members who can help us occassionally or want to work on a
specific topic that fires you up. This involves no specific
formalities nor duties.
Hi, Mike, others-
Is there a formal description somewhere of the roles/responsibilities
of the WG? That would help me evaluate to what extent (if at all) I
can participate in WG activities.
The scope of the LWG is listed at
http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licensing_Working_Group
The day to day work is answering routine license enquiries, generally by
pointing to osm.org/copyright, the guidelines, or the FAQ. That's not
particularly where help is needed - not that more help would be minded -
it's the larger items we'd like to take on.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BWn372ow_1tnTdQja76mthS8V-ZQ5PCL_RWLR1CBzkw/pub
has some of the work we'd like to take on in the near future.
We haven't worked out a precise framework for the scope of individual
associate members - it's not expected that all associate members would
participate in all parts of the LWG's work.
If associate members not having a vote would allow people to help who
would otherwise be in a conflict of interest, that could be done too.
If you have any suggestions, none of this is set in stone.
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
