sent from a phone
> Am 24.09.2015 um 11:23 schrieb Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org>:
>
>
> I would hesitate to apply this rule for making a selection that can not
> be repeated ("select reverse geocoding results for this non-public list
> of coordinates and store them in my non-public derived database").
I had understood that a database containing the list of coordinates would have
to be made public (on request), just not what they were standing for/how they
were gathered.
>
> Whether something is useful to us or not is not a factor in determining
> where ODbL share-alike applies. This is not great - I'd love a license
> that forces people to share stuff we're interested in and ignores
> everything else. But it is hard to put that in lawyerese ;)
it would also open a can of worms to get to a definition of what is stuff we
are interested in.
cheers
Martin
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
