Hi,
there was discussion regarding storing 'substantial' OSM data and also
related to geocoding. Are the following guidelines the latest effort or
is this still a work in progress or needs still approval somehow from
the community?
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Community_Guidelines/Substantial_-_Guideline
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Geocoding_-_Guideline
When I apply this to a use case of my customers of potentially caching
geocoding or route results I can conclude that this is possible when
attributing OSM plus:
* either keep the cache smaller than 100 entries or
* keep the results in a separate 'database' (e.g. used for caching)
which is then 100% ODbL but would not influence the other data
Is this correct?
Now assume I would like to avoid that the ODbL kicks in even if I have
more than 100 or even several thousands cached entries. Would that be
possible when the cache stores results only for 2 or 3 weeks maximum and
is just for the purpose of reducing request counts and increased
performance?
Kind Regards,
Peter
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
