On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > > Frederik has already touched on most of the points, however > > - in the business model you outlined it is your data and it is your > responsibility to be able to identify the individual sources of > contributions, the wholesale removal would only apply if you cannot do > that. Naturally you should actually contemplate how you would > remove/revert such a contribution if the need arises (not "somebody else > will clean it up" that is so popular). > > - non-legal: from a project perspective, OSM works best for contributors > that experience first hand that what they just contributed is actually > useful (contrary to being told by people with a vested interest that > what you've done was useful, which you may or may not believe depending > on how gullible you are, but I digress). It is an important part of > getting hooked. At least it should be clear where their contributions > are going to end up and integration with OSM proper should be as fast as > possible.
Thank you for all the thoughts on this. I appreciate the time you all took to consider and answer my questions. I will take this and carefully consider if this is the direction I should go. Cheers, Michael _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
