As has already been pointed out 3.2 could be problematic. The translation is a bit wobbly and unclear, but if I understand it correctly the intent is to reference a data set specific attribution requirement that would naturally have to be looked at for any specific data use.
The really killer is however 6.3 (which should have a different section header) which I suspect is incompatible with the Open Definition and a lot of other stuff (including common sense :-)). Simon Am 25.04.2017 um 01:38 schrieb 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson: > What do you folks think about > http://data.gov.tw/license#eng ? > Can we use that data? > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
