On 12/03/2014 03:06 AM, Eric Smith wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Thanks for reviewing the TGGPL. I've forwarded your analysis to the > author. I don't anticipate that he'll change the licensing of > Tahoe-LAFS since it won't be necessary for Fedora.
I believe Zooko knows about our stance on this, I actually discussed this with Richard Fontana when the license first came out, and Zooko was part of that discussion online. >> Any Fedora packages which include TGPPL licensed works must choose not >> to leverage the Transitive Grace Period. > > Wouldn't this inherently be true, since Fedora distributes sources of > all Fedora packages? It should be, but I thought it was worth stating explicitly, lest someone think they've found a clever loophole. :) > Since Tahoe-LAFS uses TGPPL with exceptions, should I list it in the > spec as "TGPPL with exceptions"? Yes. ~tom == Red Hat University Outreach
<<attachment: tcallawa.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
