On 11/04/2017 05:40 PM, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Well, there's really no GPLv2 only code, it's all GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+, so I 
> decided to accept the GPLv3+ from the packager.
> 
> Thanks for the help.
> 
> Mattia


COPYING file looks reporting GPLv2 license.
If the software is licensed under GPLv2, you can't report GPLv3+ license
only with License tag.

-- 
--
Antonio Trande
sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org
See my vCard.

<<attachment: sagitter.vcf>>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to