I am definitely open to ideas on how to make the license data/metadata more portable/maintainable.
Tom On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 1:38 PM David Cantrell <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > rpminspect performs a License tag validation on packages. The license data > comes from a JSON data file that I think was produced at some point from > the > Fedora charts on the wiki but then never really updated. Consequently, it > raises failures that are incorrect per current licensing data. > > The data for rpminspect comes from: > https://github.com/rpminspect/rpminspect-data-fedora > > The license data is in licenses/fedora.json > > The format should be somewhat easy to understand. I didn't create it. I > found this database and ran with it. I'd like to come up with a way to > keep > it in sync with the data on the wiki. Right now I advise package > maintainers > to send me pull requests to update the data, but that's not going to be a > long > term solution. > > Anyone have any thoughts on this? Ideas of how to keep the information up > to > date in all locations? > > Thanks, > > -- > David Cantrell <[email protected]> > Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT > _______________________________________________ > legal mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] >
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
