On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:56:35PM -0500, Richard Fontana wrote: > The SPDX legal team has indicated receptiveness to adopting "official" > identifiers for the various licenses found in Fedora Linux and > represented in spec files (in present-day Callaway notation), which I > think would potentially increase the number of such identifiers by > some significant amount (I hesitate to say "hundreds" but I could see > that being one possible trajectory, depending for example on how > things like the Callaway umbrella categories would be dealt with [if > at all]). The theory AIUI is that any license in a popular > distribution like Fedora Linux is by definition sufficiently widely > used to justify adoption of an identifier. I am not sure what they > would make of the fedora-logos license but the current SPDX identifier > list has plenty of non-FOSS licenses.
I, for one, am okay with our few non-FOSS licenses using the weird syntax. -- Matthew Miller <[email protected]> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
