On 1/14/22 2:02 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 14. 01. 22 v 0:00 Jilayne Lovejoy napsal(a):
To put it another way, I can't think of any real-world disjunctive
dual license involving a (likely) "bad" license other than the Perl
module case (where of course it is really common). If it's so unusual,
why should the guidelines address it at all? Or if the only likely
example is the Perl one, then the guidelines should only use the Perl
(GPL/Artistic) example.
well, as Miroslav began this thread asking about the scenario of
having a Good or Bad license (and didn't seem to indicate it was
specifically the Perl example - I assumed Fedora packagers are coming
across such scenarios
Nope. From me this was completely theoretical question. Just to make
the algorithm complete.
The full scan of all spec does not found any such case.
ha! well, lesson learned - I should have not assumed and began with this
question...
Miroslav
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
Fedora Code of
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
