What's the best way to raise licensing issues in already-added packages? I think there are largely two cases:
* Fedora and its distributors comply with the licensing terms, but the license is not obviously on Fedora's allowed list. An example would be an obscure field-of-use restriction (as in the JSON license). * Fedora and its distributors appear violating the license. An example would be a package that ships a pre-built Linux kernel binary without the required GPL notices, and without corresponding soruce code. Do these two cases need to be treated differently? In the past, I may have filed bugs in Bugzilla, but this might be construed as a bit rude. I looked at <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/> and couldn't find any discussion of this topic. Sorry if I missed it. Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
