Hi Zdenek,
So, it's the exceptions that are not (or may not be) on the SPDX License
List. Can you send me a link to the text for those?
Thanks,
Jilayne
On 2/9/23 8:13 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Hi all,
ppisar was doing the license review of the package when it arrived
into EPEL 9 and proposed to update the SPEC file to the latest FPG.
Since Fedora Licensing now requires SPDX names for licenses, he found
two of them without SPDX name in sane-frontends:
GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Autoconf-exception-2.0-like exception
GPL-2.0-or-later WITH gnu-javamail-exception-like exception
The former is used in config.guess+config.guess files generated
Autoconf, the latter is a license which is used in SANE project.
Would it be possible to review the licenses and assign a SPDX
identifiers for them? Or make an agreement to use just GPL-2.0-or-later?
Thank you in advance!
Zdenek
--
Zdenek Dohnal
Software Engineer
Red Hat, BRQ-TPBC
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
Fedora Code of
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
