On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 7:22 AM Zdenek Dohnal <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I've found the following licenses in Vim package, which aren't in > allowed licenses: > > Apache License v2.0 with Runtime Library Exception - see > https://swift.org/LICENSE.txt or > https://scancode-licensedb.aboutcode.org/apache-2.0-runtime-library-exception.html
This is what SPDX calls Swift-exception. Please submit an issue at https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data to add `Apache-2.0 WITH Swift-exception`. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-review-process/ > Open Publication License, v1.0 or later - see > http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/ Ignoring the 'or later' issue, this license (SPDX: OPUBL-1.0) is generally classified as "not allowed" with a usage note that says it is allowed for documentation "if the copyright holder does not exercise any of the “LICENSE OPTIONS” listed in Section VI". https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/blob/main/data/OPUBL-1.0.toml (I think we did it this way because under our new system prohibiting it by default while stating an exception was the most convenient way to express the policy, which has been in place in Fedora for at least ~15 years.) Richard _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
