Hello,
Python PEPs are licensed as:
> This document is placed in the public domain or under the CC0-1.0-Universal
> license, whichever is more permissive.
How do I express this statement in a license field of a Fedora package, if the
package includes a copy of the PEP text?
Do I use:
License: CC0-1.0
because "Public Domain" is discouraged?
Or do I use:
License: LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain
because Public Domain is more permissive?
Or do I use:
License: LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain OR CC0-1.0
because the "whichever is more permissive" clause is to be determined by
whoever wants to distribute/modify this and not by me?
Or do I use something different entirely?
---
Now suppose I have *a script* licensed like this. Do I make different choices
because CC0-1.0 is not allowed for code?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
