On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 08:42:19PM -0400, Richard Fontana wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 7:13 PM Jilayne Lovejoy <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > >    License: Apache-2.0 AND BSD-2-Clause AND BSD-3-Clause AND 
> > > BSD-3-Clause-Clear AND CDDL-1.0 AND copyleft-next-0.3.1 AND 
> > > GPL-1.0-or-later AND GPL-1.0-or-later-WITH-Linux-syscall-note AND 
> > > GPL-2.0-only AND GPL-2.0-only-WITH-Linux-syscall-note AND 
> > > GPL-2.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later-WITH-GCC-exception-2.0 AND 
> > > GPL-2.0-or-later-WITH-Linux-syscall-note AND ISC AND LGPL-2.0-or-later 
> > > AND LGPL-2.0-or-later-WITH-Linux-syscall-note AND LGPL-2.1-only AND 
> > > LGPL-2.1-only-WITH-Linux-syscall-note AND LGPL-2.1-or-later AND 
> > > LGPL-2.1-or-later-WITH-Linux-syscall-note AND Linux-OpenIB AND MIT AND 
> > > MPL-1.1 AND Redistributable, no modification permitted AND X11 AND Zlib
> > >
> > but then this would be an exception to our original policy? and how
> > would we articulate that? I'm not sure why this is really any "better"
> > than your original - it's just shorter and truncated.
> >
> > oh, and we should take a look at the "Redistributable, no modification
> > permitted" ones... that is likely the firmware licenses that were never
> > captured
> 
> In the kernel specifically, I think 'Redistributable, no modification
> permitted' resulted from a bugzilla ticket filed many years ago by
> Alexandre Oliva where he pointed out that 'GPLv2' as the kernel
> license tag was incorrect because there was some firmware hex code in
> at least one source file (this was some years after the creation of
> the linux-firmware repository upstream). I remember verifying that he
> was correct but I wonder if that code is still in the kernel today.

Some kernel folks have examined this in more detail[1] and thus far
can't find any currently built files that justify the continued
existance of the additional 'Redistributable, no modification
permitted' clause, so they're intending to drop it.

If someone does later identify files that stil justify this, the
SPDX license expression can be adjusted at that time.

With regards,
Daniel

[1] 
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2648#note_1538895124
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to