On 10/22/23 2:10 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 2:00 AM Miroslav Suchý <[email protected]> wrote:
Webkitgtk has interresting file:
Documentation/jsc-glib-4.1/fonts.css
The file has this content:
/*
* SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2021 GNOME Foundation
*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR GPL-3.0-or-later
*/
And that is all. No other content is there. So it is literaly an empty file
with license declaration.
Should this license be honored and put in License tag of spec file? Or is it
copyright of not-copyrightable file and
should be ignored?
As a general rule, empty files should be ignored. It should certainly
not be accounted for in the License tag.
There are some cases where something like this could be a clue to how
*another* file is licensed but I think that is unlikely here because
this looks like it is the result of an attempt to make a repository
REUSE-conformant.
yes, I think Richard is spot-on that this is to conform to REUSE which,
I think requires a copyright and license notice in every file. Good
intentions, not always the best outcome, though...
J.
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
