This is perhaps a silly question... am I right when I say that license text files distributed in packages should reflect just the code used in the final binary (like the License: tag)?
My question comes from a ticket [1] I raised against Rawtherapee upstream. As I recently noticed, in the upcoming next version Rawtherapee started to install license files for several things: code used in the project, code optionally used in the final output (such as bundled libraries that we don't use in Fedora as we use system's libraries), but also external libraries which Rawtherapee links to and doesn't bundle at all (I see, for example, gtkmm license text file). If upstream doesn't fix that before the final 5.13 release, I plan to manually remove license that doesn't pertain to Fedora distributed binaries. Is that right? Thanks, Mattia [1] https://github.com/RawTherapee/RawTherapee/issues/7718 -- _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
